Are TV Networks Going the Way of 1950s Radio Networks?

Is linear TV facing a crossroads today similar to what national network radio faced in the early 1950s? old_fashion_radio_microphone_md_wht

Reports that broadcast network television ratings are down across the board indicate that one network’s programming strategy is not necessarily better than another. So what might be happening? Audience behavior is changing. Nielsen, after much pressure from networks, has finally decided to include in its (miniscule) sample households that watch programming online only.

TV networks seem to be frantically trying to revive audience viewing of traditional, linear, scheduled programming, while simultaneously trying to find audiences on other platforms, such as Hulu and network web sites. Fretting about “cannibalizing” their linear audiences with timeshifting online audiences (which don’t generate as much revenue), many networks seek the magic bullet in “must see” live programming (sports, awards, contests).

This ping-ponging around reminds me of another era, the decline of network radio during the rise of network television. Many members of the radio and advertising industries believed that network radio would survive the arrival of television. Radio listening seemed so ingrained in American culture. Such large audiences gathered around the radio to hear dramas, comedies, quiz shows, and soap operas, it was hard to imagine they would ever stop.

ahummertAnne and Frank Hummert, whose soap opera “empire” dominated daytime network radio programming in the 1930s and 1940s, entered the 1950s confident that they could preserve their large audiences of housewives. Surely, women washing dishes would still listen to the radio as they worked. As audiences declined, the Hummerts tried everything they could think of. They experimented with schedules, used guest stars, changed plot lines, tried new actors, found new sponsors. Eventually, each of the programs went off the air. Their  radio soap operas—serious, didactic, ponderous, repetitious, moralistic—were replaced by more character-driven television soap operas.

Meanwhile, radio networks morphed into television networks. During the transition, the networks experimented with simulcasting programs on both radio and television; they emphasized live programming to attract audiences; and much early television programming followed well-established radio formats (game shows, variety shows, quiz shows). fifties032

In retrospect, the shift away from national network radio programming seems obvious. Of course television would replace radio as the primary entertainment medium.

Is this shift happening today, but from linear (scheduled) television to online (time-shifted) viewing? Is the television industry today, like the radio industry of the early 1950s, aware of the momentous shift and yet still in denial that it is really happening?

Several decades from now, will this transition seem similarly obvious?


3 thoughts on “Are TV Networks Going the Way of 1950s Radio Networks?

  1. Great post, and very interesting parallels. I’m wondering whether it matters in this analogy that radio eventually “re-networked” (over the next 20-30 years) through satellite, formatting, voic-tracking, etc., such that the nominal localism of post-network radio soon became a veneer over the network structure at the heart of the industry. In other words, is the network structure itself a resilient and durable organizational strategy for information delivery, and technological disruption can displace it only temporarily? The crisis of current networks a temporary reshuffling of the deck in a game that otherwise stays the same?

  2. Thanks! Of course no analogy is perfect 😉 and yes, there are new radio network forms, but I think we agree they are not the same as those of the 1930s-40s. The radio industry has since gone through other forms of centralization, such as the formation of station groups like Clear Channel, which organize stations by various formats in order to capture the largest total audience possible in one market even if scattered over multiple stations/formats. I suppose one could say that consolidation is a natural force in most industries, although what is consolidated (programming or stations or something else) will vary.

    The radio networks of the 1940s did reorganize into successful television networks: they continued to nationally distribute programming in conjunction with local programmers. What I wonder, though, is whether or not today’s TV networks will continue to have a raison d’etre in a post-linear TV world or if they will need to more radically reformulate themselves. Most of their current strategies to maintain audience attention seem to be failing–will they die off or reconfigure?

  3. Pingback: Great Advice for TV Industry | A Word from Our Sponsor

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s